| South Central Texas Region | County = Bexar | |||||||||
| County Summary of Projected Water Needs (Shortages) and Water Management Strategies | User Group(s) = all | |||||||||
| Projected Water Needs (acft/yr) | ||||||||||
| User Group(s) | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | Notes | |||
| Municipal | 131,884 | 164,107 | 206,398 | 272,467 | 326,339 | 364,328 | ||||
| Industrial | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,428 | 4,757 | 8,190 | ||||
| Steam-Electric | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Mining | 4,963 | 4,936 | 5,201 | 5,406 | 5,645 | 5,962 | ||||
| Irrigation | 14,059 | 10,935 | 9,376 | 7,883 | 6,453 | 5,082 | ||||
| Total Needs | 150,906 | 179,978 | 220,975 | 287,184 | 343,194 | 383,562 | ||||
| Mun, Ind, S-E, & Min Needs | 136,847 | 169,043 | 211,599 | 279,301 | 336,741 | 378,480 | ||||
| Irrigation Needs | 14,059 | 10,935 | 9,376 | 7,883 | 6,453 | 5,082 | ||||
| Water Management Strategies (acft/yr) | Candidate | |||||||||
| ID# | Description | New Supply | 2000* | 2010 | 2020 | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | Notes | |
| L-10 (Mun.) | Demand Reduction (Conservation) | 33,528 | 42,509 | 41,210 | 36,533 | 38,834 | 40,934 | 1 | ||
| L-15 | Edwards Irrigation Transfers | 42,686 | 25,000 | 32,986 | 32,986 | 32,986 | 32,986 | 32,986 | 2, 3 | |
| L-10 (Irr.) | Demand Reduction (Conservation) w/ Transfer | 27,314 | 27,314 | 27,314 | 27,314 | 27,314 | 27,314 | 27,314 | 4 | |
| SSWSP | Schertz-Seguin Water Supply Project (Carrizo) | 20,000 | 3,919 | 3,919 | 3,919 | 3,919 | 3,919 | 3,919 | 5 | |
| WCRWSP | Western Canyon Regional Water Supply Project | 10,527 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 500 | 500 | 6 | |
| CRWA | Lake Dunlap WTP Expansion & Mid-Cities Project | 5,200 | 5,200 | 5,200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| BMWD | Carrizo Aquifer - Bexar & Guadalupe (BMWD) | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 8 | |
| BMWD | Trinity Aquifer - Bexar (BMWD) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 8 | |
| CZ-10C | Carrizo Aquifer - Wilson & Gonzales | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 9 | |
| SCTN-3c | Simsboro Aquifer | 55,000 | 55,000 | 55,000 | 55,000 | 55,000 | 55,000 | 55,000 | 10 | |
| SCTN-16 | Lower Guadalupe River Diversions | 94,500 | 94,500 | 94,500 | 94,500 | 94,500 | 94,500 | 11 | ||
| L-18a | Edwards Recharge - Type 2 Projects | 21,577 | 13,451 | 21,577 | 21,577 | 21,577 | 21,577 | 12 | ||
| SAWS | SAWS Recycled Water Program | 52,215 | 19,826 | 26,737 | 35,824 | 43,561 | 52,215 | 13, 14 | ||
| LCRA | New Colorado River Diversion Option | 150,000 | 66,000 | 132,000 | 132,000 | 132,000 | 15 | |||
| SCTN-17 | Desalination of Seawater (75 mgd) | 84,012 | 56,008 | 84,012 | 16 | |||||
| SCTN-1a | Aquifer Storage & Recovery - Regional | 17 | ||||||||
| SCTN-4 | Brush Management | 18 | ||||||||
| SCTN-5 | Weather Modification | 18 | ||||||||
| SCTN-9 | Rainwater Harvesting | 18 | ||||||||
| Small Aquifer Recharge Dams | 18 | |||||||||
| Edwards Aquifer Recharge & Recirculation Systems | ||||||||||
| Cooperation w/ Corpus Christi for New Water Sources | ||||||||||
| Additional Storage (ASR and/or Surface) | ||||||||||
| L-10 (Irr.) | Demand Reduction (Conservation) | 1,905 | 1,905 | 1,905 | 1,905 | 1,905 | 1,905 | 19 | ||
| Total New Supplies | 177,366 | 322,110 | 396,648 | 467,058 | 529,104 | 567,862 | ||||
| Total System Mgmt. Supply / Deficit | 26,460 | 142,132 | 175,673 | 179,874 | 185,910 | 184,300 | ||||
| Mun, Ind, S-E, & Min System Mgmt. Supply / Deficit | 38,614 | 151,162 | 183,144 | 185,852 | 190,458 | 187,477 | ||||
| Irrigation System Mgmt. Supply / Deficit | -12,154 | -9,030 | -7,471 | -5,978 | -4,548 | -3,177 | ||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||
| * | Candidate New Supplies shown for year 2000 are identified for priority implementation, but will not be available immediately. | |||||||||
| 1 | Many Conservation strategies included in projected water demands. Supplies shown reflect implementation of additional conservation measures. | |||||||||
| 2 | Candidate New Supply to be shared among Uvalde, Medina, Atascosa, and Bexar Counties. | |||||||||
| 3 | Pursuant to draft EAA Critical Period Management rules, Candidate New Supply represents approximately 85 percent of the estimated annual | |||||||||
| transfer of 50,219 acft (about 53 percent of a maximum annual transfer of 95,430 acft based on Proposed Permits prorated to 400,000 acft/yr). | ||||||||||
| 4 | Pursuant to draft EAA Critical Period Management rules, Candidate New Supply represents approximately 85 percent of the estimated annual | |||||||||
| transfer of 32,134 acft (based on installation of LEPA systems on about 53 percent of applicable acreage in Bexar, Medina, & Uvalde Counties). | ||||||||||
| 5 | Project in implementation phase. Includes delivery of groundwater from southern Gonzales County to the City of Schertz. | |||||||||
| 6 | Project in implementation phase. Includes delivery of GBRA Canyon Reservoir water from Lake Dunlap to entities in Bexar County. | |||||||||
| Project is dependent upon amendment of CA# 18-2074 authorizing additional diversions from Canyon Reservoir. | ||||||||||
| 7 | Project in implementation phase. Includes delivery of Canyon Reservoir water to CRWA's member entities. Contract expires in 2018. | |||||||||
| 8 | Project in implementation phase. Non-interruptible supplies identified by BMWD in Water Supply Program of 1/31/2000. | |||||||||
| 9 | Includes 11,000 acft/yr and 5,000 acft/yr. from Wilson and Gonzales Counties, respectively. Effects on regional aquifer levels quantified. | |||||||||
| 10 | Effects on regional aquifer levels quantified. Region L estimates of groundwater development exceed Region K estimates of availability in and | |||||||||
| beyond 2030. Regions have agreed that discussion of differences will be more productive upon completion of new Groundwater Availability Models. | ||||||||||
| 11 | Candidate New Supply includes existing water rights, unappropriated streamflow, off-channel storage, and groundwater. | |||||||||
| 12 | Includes 15 recharge enhancement projects on streams from the Nueces River in the west to the Blanco River in the east. | |||||||||
| Alternative size projects at identified locations are consistent with Regional Water Plan. | ||||||||||
| 13 | Current SAWS Reuse Water Program is included as 24,941 acft/yr (consumptive reuse) in existing supply. | |||||||||
| 14 | Future use of reuse water for non-potable uses and based on goal of meeting 20 percent of SAWS projected water demand. | |||||||||
| 15 | Candidate New Supply to be shared by Bexar and Hays Counties. Based on LCRA Regional Water Sharing Alternatives (7/6/2000). | |||||||||
| Delivery to Bexar County through diversion from Colorado River @ Bay City. | ||||||||||
| 16 | Saltwater intake located in San Antonio Bay. | |||||||||
| 17 | SAWS ASR program in southern Bexar County increases reliability of Edwards Aquifer supply and reduces seasonal aquifer demands. | |||||||||
| 18 | Option expected to provide additional water supply in many years, but dependable supply during drought is presently unquantified. | |||||||||
| 19 | Estimates based on remaining irrigation water conservation potential through LEPA installation after consideration of Edwards Irrigation | |||||||||
| Transfers (L-15) and transfer of water conserved through irrigation Demand Reduction (L-10) to Bexar County municipal supply. | ||||||||||