Table 5.2-25.  South Central Texas Regional Water Plan – TWDB Evaluation Criteria Summary

 

Management Strategy

Quantity (acft/yr)1

Reliability2

Unit Cost ($/acft)3

Environmental Factors

Impacts on Water Resources

Impacts on Agricultural and Natural Resources

Other Relevant Factors per SCTRWPG

Municipal Demand Reduction (Conservation)

(L-10 Mun.)

44,566

Firm

$173

·          None.  Supply developed through demand reduction.

·          Slight reductions in treated effluent discharge.

·          Fewer water management strategies necessary to meet projected needs.

·          Conservation is a central element of the Plan.

Irrigation Demand Reduction (Conservation) w/ Transfer (L-10 Irr.)

27,314

Firm

$36

·          None.  Supply developed through demand reduction.

·          Reductions in springflow due to relocation of pumpage closer to springs.

·          Installation of LEPA systems on 53 percent of applicable acreage in Uvalde, Medina, & Bexar.

·          Consistent with conservation focus of Plan.

Irrigation Demand Reduction (Conservation) (L-10 Irr.)

28,903

Firm

$77

·          None.  Supply developed through conservation.

·          More efficient use of limited water resources.

·          Potential to irrigate more acres using less water.

·          Recommended to offset projected irrigation needs (shortages) in six counties.

Edwards Irrigation Transfers (L-15)

42,686

Firm

$80

·          None.  Supply developed without new facilities.

·          Reductions in springflow due to relocation of pumpage closer to springs.

·          Plan includes 53 percent of potential maximum voluntary transfer through lease or purchase.

·          Encourages beneficial use of available rights.

Edwards Recharge – Type 2 Projects (L-18a)

21,577

Firm

$1,087

·          Concerns with endangered & threatened species, habitat, and TPWD Ecologically Unique Stream Segments at some sites.

·          Enhanced springflows help endangered species.

·          Limited, as most projects are located on streams that are frequently dry.

·          Increased aquifer levels and springflows.

·          Typically higher aquifer levels in Uvalde & Medina Counties.

·          Positive effects on discharges from Comal and San Marcos Springs.

·          Mitigation of impacts on firm yield of Choke Canyon Res. / Lake Corpus Christi System.

Canyon Reservoir – River Diversion (G-15C)

15,700

Firm

$743