| Attachment E Table A | ||||||||||
| Water Management Strategy L-10 (Municipal Conservation) | Revised Demand Reduction and Revised Costs | |||||||||
| Entries presented below replace entries of the Regional Water Plan Table Numbers shown in Column One of this table. | ||||||||||
| Table | Water User Group | |||||||||
| Number | WUG | Item | Units | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | |
| 5.3.1-2 | Charlotte | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 2 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
| 5.3.1-2 | Charlotte | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 2 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
| 5.3.1-3 | Charlotte | Annual Cost | $/yr | 522 | 1,694 | 1,816 | 624 | 540 | 588 | |
| 5.3.1-3 | Charlotte | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 242 | 227 | 104 | 90 | 84 | |
| 5.3.1-4 | Jourdanton | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 4 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 13 | 14 | |
| 5.3.1-4 | Jourdanton | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 4 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 13 | 14 | |
| 5.3.1-5 | Jourdanton | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,044 | 4,840 | 2,497 | 1,872 | 1,170 | 1,176 | |
| 5.3.1-5 | Jourdanton | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 242 | 227 | 104 | 90 | 84 | |
| 5.3.1-6 | Lytle | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 5 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 5 | |
| 5.3.1-6 | Lytle | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 505 | 509 | 510 | 508 | 708 | 705 | |
| 5.3.1-7 | Lytle | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,305 | 2,178 | 2,270 | 832 | 720 | 420 | |
| 5.3.1-7 | Lytle | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 242 | 227 | 104 | 90 | 84 | |
| 5.3.1-8 | Pleasanton | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 11 | 52 | 30 | 50 | 36 | 38 | |
| 5.3.1-8 | Pleasanton | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 11 | 52 | 30 | 50 | 36 | 38 | |
| 5.3.1-9 | Pleasanton | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,871 | 12,584 | 6,810 | 5,200 | 3,240 | 3,192 | |
| 5.3.1-9 | Pleasanton | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 242 | 227 | 104 | 90 | 84 | |
| 5.3.1-10 | Poteet | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 4 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 12 | 7 | |
| 5.3.1-10 | Poteet | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 4 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 12 | 7 | |
| 5.3.1-11 | Poteet | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,044 | 3,630 | 3,632 | 1,872 | 1,080 | 588 | |
| 5.3.1-11 | Poteet | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 242 | 227 | 104 | 90 | 84 | |
| 5.3.2-5 | Alamo Heights | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 16 | 33 | 26 | 26 | 27 | 9 | |
| 5.3.2-5 | Alamo Heights | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,516 | 1,533 | 1,526 | 1,526 | 1,527 | 1,509 | |
| 5.3.2-6 | Alamo Heights | Annual Cost | $/yr | 4,048 | 7,821 | 6,084 | 1,430 | 1,377 | 441 | |
| 5.3.2-6 | Alamo Heights | Unit Cost | $/acft | 253 | 237 | 234 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-7 | Balcones Heights | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 8 | 17 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 6 | |
| 5.3.2-7 | Balcones Heights | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 508 | 517 | 514 | 515 | 1,016 | 1,006 | |
| 5.3.2-8 | Balcones Heights | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,000 | 3,893 | 3,122 | 825 | 816 | 294 | |
| 5.3.2-8 | Balcones Heights | Unit Cost | $/acft | 250 | 229 | 223 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-9 | China Grove | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 3 | |
| 5.3.2-9 | China Grove | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 504 | 508 | 507 | 506 | 508 | 503 | |
| 5.3.2-10 | China Grove | Annual Cost | $/yr | 980 | 1,736 | 1,484 | 330 | 408 | 147 | |
| 5.3.2-10 | China Grove | Unit Cost | $/acft | 245 | 217 | 212 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-11 | Converse | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-11 | Converse | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 2,000 | 2,500 | 3,000 | 4,000 | 5,000 | 6,000 | |
| 5.3.2-12 | Converse | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-12 | Converse | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-13 | Elmendorf | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-13 | Elmendorf | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 5.3.2-14 | Elmendorf | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-14 | Elmendorf | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-15 | Fair Oaks Ranch | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 5 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 5 | |
| 5.3.2-15 | Fair Oaks Ranch | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,905 | 1,911 | 1,905 | 1,911 | 1,911 | 1,905 | |
| 5.3.2-16 | Fair Oaks Ranch | Annual Cost | $/yr | 990 | 1,716 | 805 | 605 | 561 | 245 | |
| 5.3.2-16 | Fair Oaks Ranch | Unit Cost | $/acft | 198 | 156 | 161 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-17 | Helotes | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 2 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 5 | |
| 5.3.2-17 | Helotes | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 502 | 509 | 507 | 509 | 510 | 505 | |
| 5.3.2-18 | Helotes | Annual Cost | $/yr | 398 | 1,791 | 1,393 | 495 | 510 | 245 | |
| 5.3.2-18 | Helotes | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 199 | 199 | 199 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-20 | Kirby | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-20 | Kirby | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,000 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 5.3.2-21 | Kirby | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-21 | Kirby | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-21 | Leon Valley | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 14 | 57 | 56 | 57 | 43 | 31 | |
| 5.3.2-21 | Leon Valley | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 614 | 657 | 656 | 657 | 643 | 631 | |
| 5.3.2-22 | Leon Valley | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,786 | 11,343 | 11,144 | 3,135 | 2,193 | 1,519 | |
| 5.3.2-22 | Leon Valley | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 199 | 199 | 199 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-23 | Live Oak WPU | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-23 | Live Oak WPU | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 5.3.2-24 | Live Oak WPU | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-24 | Live Oak WPU | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-25 | Olmos Park | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 5 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 4 | |
| 5.3.2-25 | Olmos Park | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 505 | 512 | 510 | 510 | 511 | 504 | |
| 5.3.2-26 | Olmos Park | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,245 | 2,736 | 2,220 | 550 | 561 | 196 | |
| 5.3.2-26 | Olmos Park | Unit Cost | $/acft | 249 | 228 | 222 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-29 | Schertz; outside city | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 5 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 4 | |
| 5.3.2-29 | Schertz; outside city | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 2,409 | 2,412 | 2,410 | 2,410 | 2,411 | 2,404 | |
| 5.3.2-30 | Schertz; outside city | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,315 | 2,832 | 2,170 | 550 | 561 | 196 | |
| 5.3.2-30 | Schertz; outside city | Unit Cost | $/acft | 263 | 236 | 217 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-31 | Shavano Park | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 2 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 3 | |
| 5.3.2-31 | Shavano Park | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,002 | 1,011 | 1,006 | 1,009 | 1,007 | 1,003 | |
| 5.3.2-32 | Shavano Park | Annual Cost | $/yr | 490 | 2,398 | 1,272 | 495 | 357 | 147 | |
| 5.3.2-32 | Shavano Park | Unit Cost | $/acft | 245 | 218 | 212 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-33 | St. Hedwig | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-33 | St. Hedwig | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-34 | St. Hedwig | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-34 | St. Hedwig | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-35 | Terrell Hills | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 11 | 24 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 7 | |
| 5.3.2-35 | Terrell Hills | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,011 | 1,024 | 1,020 | 1,020 | 1,020 | 1,007 | |
| 5.3.2-36 | Terrell Hills | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,750 | 5,616 | 4,560 | 1,100 | 1,020 | 343 | |
| 5.3.2-36 | Terrell Hills | Unit Cost | $/acft | 250 | 234 | 228 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-37 | Universal City | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 36 | 65 | 53 | 62 | 70 | 40 | |
| 5.3.2-37 | Universal City | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 2,536 | 2,565 | 3,053 | 3,562 | 4,570 | 5,040 | |
| 5.3.2-38 | Universal City | Annual Cost | $/yr | 8,784 | 13,910 | 10,653 | 3,410 | 3,570 | 1,960 | |
| 5.3.2-38 | Universal City | Unit Cost | $/acft | 244 | 214 | 201 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-39 | Windcrest | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 13 | 28 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 8 | |
| 5.3.2-39 | Windcrest | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 13 | 28 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 8 | |
| 5.3.2-40 | Windcrest | Annual Cost | $/yr | 3,289 | 6,636 | 5,126 | 1,210 | 1,173 | 392 | |
| 5.3.2-40 | Windcrest | Unit Cost | $/acft | 253 | 237 | 233 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-41 | BMWD (Castle Hills) | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 6 | 24 | 19 | 19 | 13 | 13 | |
| 5.3.2-41 | BMWD (Castle Hills) | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,506 | 1,524 | 1,519 | 1,519 | 1,513 | 1,513 | |
| 5.3.2-42 | BMWD (Castle Hills) | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,470 | 5,424 | 4,256 | 1,045 | 663 | 637 | |
| 5.3.2-42 | BMWD (Castle Hills) | Unit Cost | $/acft | 245 | 226 | 224 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-43 | BMWD (Somerset) | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-43 | BMWD (Somerset) | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | |
| 5.3.2-44 | BMWD (Somerset) | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-44 | BMWD (Somerset) | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.2-45 | BMWD (HC/HPK) | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 6 | 20 | 23 | 27 | 20 | 11 | |
| 5.3.2-45 | BMWD (HC/HPK) | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 3,206 | 3,220 | 3,223 | 3,227 | 3,220 | 3,711 | |
| 5.3.2-46 | BMWD (HC/HPK) | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,434 | 4,240 | 4,600 | 1,485 | 1,020 | 539 | |
| 5.3.2-46 | BMWD (HC/HPK) | Unit Cost | $/acft | 239 | 212 | 200 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-47 | BMWD (Other Sbd) | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 141 | 187 | 233 | 275 | 319 | 345 | |
| 5.3.2-47 | BMWD (Other Sbd) | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 16,278 | 22,324 | 22,370 | 30,412 | 35,319 | 39,345 | |
| 5.3.2-48 | BMWD (Other Sbd) | Annual Cost | $/yr | 34,968 | 39,644 | 45,668 | 15,125 | 16,269 | 16,905 | |
| 5.3.2-48 | BMWD (Other Sbd) | Unit Cost | $/acft | 248 | 212 | 196 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-49 | Ft. Sam Houston | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 27 | 67 | 54 | 54 | 40 | 27 | |
| 5.3.2-49 | Ft. Sam Houston | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,527 | 1,567 | 1,554 | 1,554 | 1,540 | 1,527 | |
| 5.3.2-50 | Ft. Sam Houston | Annual Cost | $/yr | 5,373 | 13,333 | 10,746 | 2,970 | 2,040 | 1,323 | |
| 5.3.2-50 | Ft. Sam Houston | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 199 | 199 | 199 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-51 | Lackland AFB | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 31 | 52 | 42 | 31 | 31 | 10 | |
| 5.3.2-51 | Lackland AFB | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,531 | 1,552 | 1,542 | 1,531 | 1,531 | 1,510 | |
| 5.3.2-52 | Lackland AFB | Annual Cost | $/yr | 6,169 | 10,348 | 8,358 | 1,705 | 1,581 | 490 | |
| 5.3.2-52 | Lackland AFB | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 199 | 199 | 199 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.2-53 | Randolph AFB | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 13 | 22 | 13 | 18 | 13 | 4 | |
| 5.3.2-53 | Randolph AFB | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1,013 | 1,022 | 1,013 | 1,018 | 1,013 | 1,004 | |
| 5.3.2-54 | Randolph AFB | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,587 | 4,378 | 2,587 | 990 | 663 | 196 | |
| 5.3.2-54 | Randolph AFB | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 199 | 199 | 199 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.3-2 | Lockhart | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-2 | Lockhart | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 500 | 500 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
| 5.3.3-3 | Lockhart | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-3 | Lockhart | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-4 | Luling | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 13 | 41 | 39 | 45 | 26 | 29 | |
| 5.3.3-4 | Luling | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 13 | 41 | 39 | 45 | 26 | 29 | |
| 5.3.3-5 | Luling | Annual Cost | $/yr | 3,107 | 8,774 | 7,488 | 7,245 | 3,692 | 3,683 | |
| 5.3.3-5 | Luling | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 239 | 214 | 192 | 161 | 142 | 127 | |
| 5.3.3-6 | Martindale | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-6 | Martindale | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-7 | Martindale | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.3-7 | Martindale | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-2 | Point Comfort | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-2 | Point Comfort | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-3 | Point Comfort | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-3 | Point Comfort | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-4 | Port Lavaca | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-4 | Port Lavaca | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | |
| 5.3.4-5 | Port Lavaca | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-5 | Port Lavaca | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-6 | Seadrift | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-6 | Seadrift | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-7 | Seadrift | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.4-7 | Seadrift | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.5-2 | Garden Ridge | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 6 | |
| 5.3.5-2 | Garden Ridge | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 400 | 457 | 504 | 711 | 711 | 706 | |
| 5.3.5-3 | Garden Ridge | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 1,344 | 652 | 1,144 | 1,001 | 474 | |
| 5.3.5-3 | Garden Ridge | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 225 | 192 | 163 | 104 | 91 | 79 | |
| 5.3.5-4 | New Braunfels | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 112 | 146 | 186 | 214 | 246 | |
| 5.3.5-4 | New Braunfels | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 580 | 8,412 | 13,366 | 16,206 | 20,234 | 23,266 | |
| 5.3.5-5 | New Braunfels | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 22,512 | 24,820 | 19,344 | 19,474 | 19,434 | |
| 5.3.5-5 | New Braunfels | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 234 | 201 | 170 | 104 | 91 | 79 | |
| 5.3.6-2 | Cuero | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 16 | 42 | 26 | 28 | 29 | 10 | |
| 5.3.6-2 | Cuero | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 16 | 42 | 26 | 28 | 29 | 10 | |
| 5.3.6-3 | Cuero | Annual Cost | $/yr | 3,888 | 10,080 | 6,084 | 5,264 | 5,220 | 1,730 | |
| 5.3.6-3 | Cuero | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 243 | 240 | 234 | 188 | 180 | 173 | |
| 5.3.6-4 | Yoakum | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-4 | Yoakum | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-5 | Yoakum | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-5 | Yoakum | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-6 | Yorktown | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-6 | Yorktown | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-7 | Yorktown | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.6-7 | Yorktown | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.7-2 | Big Wells | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 5.3.7-2 | Big Wells | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 5.3.7-3 | Big Wells | Annual Cost | $/yr | 807 | 1,285 | 992 | 309 | 276 | 82 | |
| 5.3.7-3 | Big Wells | Unit Cost | $/acft | 269 | 257 | 248 | 103 | 92 | 82 | |
| 5.3.7-4 | Carrizo Springs | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 8 | 29 | 34 | 26 | 30 | 34 | |
| 5.3.7-4 | Carrizo Springs | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 508 | 1,029 | 1,034 | 2,526 | 3,030 | 3,534 | |
| 5.3.7-5 | Carrizo Springs | Annual Cost | $/yr | 2,088 | 6,902 | 7,378 | 2,678 | 2,760 | 2,788 | |
| 5.3.7-5 | Carrizo Springs | Unit Cost | $/acft | 261 | 238 | 217 | 103 | 92 | 82 | |
| 5.3.8-2 | Dilley | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 7 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 9 | |
| 5.3.8-2 | Dilley | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 7 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 9 | |
| 5.3.8-3 | Dilley | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,715 | 3,465 | 2,860 | 1,443 | 1,512 | 936 | |
| 5.3.8-3 | Dilley | Unit Cost | $/acft | 245 | 231 | 220 | 111 | 108 | 104 | |
| 5.3.8-4 | Pearsall | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 18 | 30 | 33 | 34 | 24 | 12 | |
| 5.3.8-4 | Pearsall | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 18 | 30 | 33 | 34 | 24 | 12 | |
| 5.3.8-5 | Pearsall | Annual Cost | $/yr | 4,410 | 6,960 | 7,260 | 3,774 | 2,592 | 1,248 | |
| 5.3.8-5 | Pearsall | Unit Cost | $/acft | 245 | 232 | 220 | 111 | 108 | 104 | |
| 5.3.9-2 | Goliad | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 5 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | |
| 5.3.9-2 | Goliad | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 5 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | |
| 5.3.9-3 | Goliad | Annual Cost | $/yr | 1,270 | 2,540 | 2,032 | 1,168 | 1,128 | 417 | |
| 5.3.9-3 | Goliad | Unit Cost | $/acft | 254 | 254 | 254 | 146 | 141 | 139 | |
| 5.3.10-2 | Gonzales | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 16 | 33 | 35 | 26 | 18 | 18 | |
| 5.3.10-2 | Gonzales | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 16 | 33 | 35 | 26 | 18 | 18 | |
| 5.3.10-3 | Gonzales | Annual Cost | $/yr | 4,720 | 9,504 | 9,905 | 3,796 | 2,538 | 2,502 | |
| 5.3.10-3 | Gonzales | Unit Cost | $/acft | 295 | 288 | 283 | 146 | 141 | 139 | |
| 5.3.10-4 | Nixon | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.10-4 | Nixon | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.10-5 | Nixon | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.10-5 | Nixon | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.10-6 | Waelder | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 5.3.10-6 | Waelder | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 5.3.10-7 | Waelder | Annual Cost | $/yr | 312 | 936 | 936 | 438 | 423 | 139 | |
| 5.3.10-7 | Waelder | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 312 | 312 | 312 | 146 | 141 | 139 | |
| 5.3.11-2 | Cibolo | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-2 | Cibolo | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-3 | Cibolo | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-3 | Cibolo | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-4 | Marion | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-4 | Marion | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-5 | Marion | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-5 | Marion | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-6 | McQueeney | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-6 | McQueeney | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-7 | McQueeney | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-7 | McQueeney | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.11-8 | Schertz | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 25 | 29 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 40 | |
| 5.3.11-8 | Schertz | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 7,621 | 7,625 | 7,626 | 7,629 | 7,632 | 7,636 | |
| 5.3.11-9 | Schertz | Annual Cost | $/yr | 6,575 | 6,844 | 6,510 | 1,815 | 1,836 | 1,960 | |
| 5.3.11-9 | Schertz | Unit Cost | $/acft | 263 | 236 | 217 | 55 | 51 | 49 | |
| 5.3.11-10 | Seguin | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 26 | 63 | 77 | 93 | 111 | 132 | |
| 5.3.11-10 | Seguin | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 6,426 | 6,463 | 6,477 | 6,493 | 6,511 | 6,532 | |
| 5.3.11-11 | Seguin | Annual Cost | $/yr | 6,084 | 12,663 | 13,090 | 9,672 | 10,101 | 10,428 | |
| 5.3.11-11 | Seguin | Unit Cost* | $/acft | 234 | 201 | 170 | 104 | 91 | 79 | |
| 5.3.12-2 | Kyle | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-2 | Kyle | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-3 | Kyle | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-3 | Kyle | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-4 | San Marcos | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 84 | 223 | 219 | 191 | 248 | 161 | |
| 5.3.12-4 | San Marcos | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 5,084 | 5,223 | 5,919 | 10,791 | 15,948 | 27,361 | |
| 5.3.12-5 | San Marcos | Annual Cost | $/yr | 20,748 | 47,053 | 38,982 | 22,156 | 22,320 | 11,109 | |
| 5.3.12-5 | San Marcos | Unit Cost | $/acft | 247 | 211 | 178 | 116 | 90 | 69 | |
| 5.3.12-6 | Wimberley | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-6 | Wimberley | Total New Supply | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 400 | |
| 5.3.12-7 | Wimberley | Annual Cost | $/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-7 | Wimberley | Unit Cost | $/acft | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5.3.12-8 | Woodcreek | Demand Reduction | acft/yr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||